Recidivism risk assessment within prison system: Accomplishments and challenges

Author:

Petrović Vera,Jovanić GoranORCID

Abstract

As one of the fundamental segments of penal treatment, recidivism risk assessment has been through numerous modifications since its beginning. When taking recidivism risk assessment as a key segment which serves as a base for all decisions on the type and intensity of the treatment a convict should forego, it is clear why the attention of scientists and experts in the field of criminal treatment is predominately focused on the matter at hand. The achievements so far undeniably indicate that recidivism risk assessment which is conducted using relevant instruments is significantly better than the one that is based on professional and personal experience of experts or their intuition. Nonetheless, there are still certain dilemmas and challenges that are targets of criticism but that are also the drivers of constant recidivism risk assessment instrument reevaluation and improvement. The reevaluation and improvement is done with the aim of designing a quality risk assessment instrument the use of which would contribute to the reduction of the risk of recidivism and enhance public safety with optimum utilization of limited resources which are invested in the correction system. Bearing the aforementioned in mind, the aim of the paper is recidivism risk assessment in convicts within the prison system. The goal is to analyze relevant research papers analyzing the achievements as well as the issues related to assessment and to provide the guidelines for further development and improvement of the process.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference59 articles.

1. Administrative Office of the US Courts (AOUSC). (2018). An overview of the federal post conviction risk assessment. https://www. uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/overview_of_the_post_conviction_ risk_assessment_0.pdf. dostupan 22. 1. 2022.;

2. Andrews, D. A., Dowden, C. (2007). The risk-need-responsivity model of assessment and human service in prevention and corrections: Crime-prevention jurisprudence. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 49(4): 439-464. doi: 10.3138/ cjccj.49.4.439;

3. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52. doi: 10.1177/0093854890017001004;

4. Austin, J. (2006). How much risk can we take: The misuse of risk assessment in corrections. Federal Probation, 70(2):58-63.;

5. Austin, J., Coleman, D., Peyton, J., Johnson, K.D. (2003). Reliability and validity study of the LSI-R risk assessment instrument. The Institute on Crime, Justice and Corrections at The George Washington University.;

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3