On entrapment operations used in criminal investigation

Author:

Marinković DarkoORCID,Tasić MarijaORCID

Abstract

In an effort to test the behaviour, attitudes, and commitment of those they care about, people have long simulated certain actions and events, seeking to confirm or disprove doubts about their sincerity or loyalty. Over time, simulation has evolved into a cognitive method that speaks first-hand about a person and their behaviour in situations where they believe their actions will remain a secret for others. This was also recognized by the state entities responsible for combating crime, primarily the police, realizing that secret and consensual illegal actions cannot be proven without assuming fictitious roles of criminals and organizing entrapment operations and simulated events, through which they will be exposed. However, such investigative methods immediately revealed themselves to be highly sensitive in terms of the freedoms and rights of individuals they are aiming at, as well as potential abuses and punishment of innocent citizens. The issues of the basis for the application of the entrapment operations, the determination of the person against whom the action will be taken, the actions of the police in the role of agent provocateur and in connection with that inciting the commission of a criminal offense in simulated events, among others, highlight the complexity and importance of studying this topic in criminal investigation.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Bell, R. E. (2001). Undercover Sting Operations in Money-Laundering Cases. Journal of Money Laundering Control. 4(4): 333-343;

2. Bill, K. (2002). Springtime for Saddam. N.Y. TIMES. Apr. 6/2002;

3. Biblija, Stari i Novi zavet, prva knjiga Mojsijeva -Postanje (glava XXII);

4. Constantin and Stoian v Romania. Merits and just satisfaction, App no 23782/06, App no 46629/06, IHRL 3676 (ECHR 2009). 29th September 2009. European Court of Human Rights [ECHR];

5. Connors, C. J., Nakita, A., Smith, S. M., Patry, W. (2017). Shocking the Conscience: Public Responses to Police Use of the "Mr. Big" Technique. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. vol. 17(1): 25-37;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3