Detention in the criminal procedure legislation of Serbia and experiences of the public prosecutor's office for organized crime: (Non) compliance with European standards?

Author:

Banović BožidarORCID,Čvorović DraganaORCID,Vari Vince

Abstract

Freedom as one of the key values in a democratic society is limited by the contemporary needs of protecting the individual from arbitrariness and illegality, regardless of the sphere of social life in which the individual exists. This freedom, in our case freedom of movement, is determined by legal boundaries, both from the aspect of the national framework and international standards. Namely, present-day states set the realization of human rights as one of the main goals, but also the possibility of restrictions due to necessity in a democratic society and with a restrictive approach to the basis of legal restrictions, in this case restrictions on the right to freedom and security of person. In accordance with that, the paper critically analyses the adequacy of positive legal norms that regulate detention in Serbia and research was conducted in the Prosecutor's Office for Organized Crime. In the conducted research, for the purpose of collecting primary data, a specially designed instrument was used - a survey questionnaire consisting of 7 questions. The aim of the research is to consider the adequacy of the legal norm and the efficiency of its application when it comes to the measure of detention, but also to identify problems in practice when determining the said measure. The results of the research indicate that the reform of the measure of detention is necessary, not only from the aspect of the national framework, but also the degree of harmonization with contemporary comparative criminal procedure legislation and European standards of deprivation of liberty.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. Amatrudo, A., William-Blake, L. (2015). Human rights and the criminal justice system. Routlege, Taylor & Francis Group, New York;

2. Banović, B. (2019). Jemstvo kao mera obezbedjenja prisustva ok rivljenog u krivičnom postupku-norma, praksa i dosadašnja iskustva u primeni, U Zbornik radova " Pritvor i druge mere obe z be đenja prisustva okrivljenog u krivičnom postupku (međunarodni pravni standardi, regionalna zakonodavstva i primena) ", Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji, Beograd, pp. 201-225;

3. Bejatović, S. (2010). Efficiency of the Process as an International Legal Standard, In Conference proceedings "Serbian criminal law and EU standards", Serbian Association for Criminal Law Theory and Practice Belgrade, Belgrade, pp. 184-208;

4. Bejatović, S. (2014a). Criminal Procedure Law. Official Gazette, Belgrade;

5. Bejatović, S. (2014b). Prosecutorial investigation as a feature of the reform of criminal procedural legislation of countries in the region, In Conference proceedings "Prosecutorial investigation", OSCE, Belgrade, pp. 11-33;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3