(Non)aligned evidence standards for search of apartments, premises and persons in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Author:

Buha Milijana

Abstract

The search of an apartment or any other type of premises is a procedural act of coercion against a suspect and another person who is believed to be helping to hide the perpetrators, accomplices of the crime, or objects significant for criminal proceedings. Is the search of the person acceptable based on the right to defense by silence? Evidence in criminal proceedings search of apartment and person are evidence that violates the right to privacy, as well as special investigative actions. However, in the laws on criminal procedure in Bosnia and Herzegovina, the standard of proof for searches of apartments and persons is lower than for special investigative actions. The standard of doubt required for searching is probability that is based on facts, but the standard of doubt required for special investigative actions is reasonable suspicion. Reasonable suspicion is a higher degree of suspicion based on the collected evidence which point to the conclusion that a criminal offense has been committed. The paper addresses the question as to what motivated the legislator to opt for a lower standard of proof for searching in relation to special investigative actions if this evidence limits the right to privacy.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. Bejatović, S. (2015). Glavni pretres i njegov doprinos obezbeđenju suđenja u razumnom roku, Glavni pretres i suđenje u razumnom roku - regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakono da vs tva i iskustva u primeni. Beograd: Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji: 9-33;

2. Clermont, K. M., Sherwin, E. A. (2002). Comparative View of Standards of Proof. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, (2): 243-275;

3. Delić, N. (2010). Krivična dela protiv pravosuđa u svetlu izmena i dopuna iz 2009. godine. Godišnjak Pravnog faku lte ta u Istočnom Sarajevu, I, (1): 77-103;

4. Dimitrijević, D. (1981). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd: Savremena administracija;

5. Grubač, M., Vasiljević, T. (2014). Komentar Zakooniika o krivičnom postupku. Beograd: Projuris;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3