Etičke dileme u medicinskom tretmanu novorođenčadi sa teškim kongenitalnim malformacijama - zaostavština bebe Doe

Author:

Živanović Dejan,Javorac Jovan,Filipović Branislav,Doronjski Aleksandra,Milenković Ana,Dimoski ZvonkoORCID,Smuđa MirjanaORCID

Abstract

Regardless of the differences in the neonatological practice of different countries in the world, ethical decisions of medical professionals in this field of clinical medicine should be based solely on a comprehensive The approach to the treatment of newborns with life-threatening body malformations has historically been the subject of numerous ethical dilemmas among the medical professionals and the general public. "The case of baby Doe" is certainly the most notable example in the recent medical history of the previously mentioned ethical dilemmas and was the first to result in an official juridical epilogue in a form of a series of legal provisions regarding the medical treatment of severely damaged newborns and objective assessment of the health of the newborn, consideration of indications for potential treatment or palliative care, and always guided by the best interests of the newborn. Eythanasia in any form is an unnecessary solution, dangerous for society in general and medical practice, and instead of its legalization in neonatology, the development of palliative care, as a humanistic approach in the health care of the most challenging patients, should be emphasised.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference12 articles.

1. Marić J. Medicinska etika. Beograd: Megraf; 2001;

2. Lang GC. "Baby Doe" -a medical ethical issue. West J Med. 1985;142(6):837-41;

3. White M. The end at the beginning. The Ochsner Journal. 2011;11(4):309-16;

4. Annas GJ. The case of baby Jane Doe: child abuse or unlawful federal intervention? Am J Public Health. 1984;74(7):727-9;

5. Singer P. Sanctity of life or quality of life. Pediatrics. 1983;72(1):128-9;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3