Abstract
An important condition for the formation of sustainability of agriculture is the ability to achieve environmental tradeoffs in the process of land use. The purpose of research is development of methodical approaches to formation of strategy of rational land use by means of improvement of administrative activity at microlevel. Authors have formulated concept of strategy of rational use of land, basic principles, elements and sequence of its construction. The structural mechanism of realization of strategy of maintenance of readiness of the personnel to rational use of land, and also bringing material and technical, financial and land resources in strategic conformity for achievement of ecological compromises in the course of conducting agricultural activity is offered. The authors developed a conceptual model of a strategic map of rational land use on the basis of a balanced system of economic and environmental indicators, and proposed directions for its implementation.
Publisher
Balkan Scientific Association of Agricultural Economists
Subject
Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Drug Discovery,Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference60 articles.
1. American Psychological Association (2018). Psychology -APA Dictionary of Psychology. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/psychology (July 20, 2022);
2. Ansoff, I. (1965). Corporate Strategy: An Analytical Approach to Business Policy for Growth and Expansion, New York: McGraw-Hill. -241 p;
3. Atieno, M., Herrmann, L., & Nguyen, H. (2020). Assessment of biofertilizer use for sustainable agriculture in the great Mekong region. Journal of Environmental Management, 275, 111-300;
4. Batie, S.S. (2009). Green payments and the US Farm Bill: information and policy challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7, 380-388;
5. Barreiro-Hurlé, J., Espinosa-Goded, M., & Dupraz, P. (2010). Does intensity of change matter? Factors affecting adoption of agri-environmental schemes in Spain. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53 (7), 891-905;