Abstract
Among many important requirements for packaging materials, environmental friendliness is a property that has become necessary for any material that needs to be competitive in the market. Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) is an analytical instrument that provides a framework for analyzing the impact of products and services on the environment, i.e. provides an understanding and the possibility of comparing different products. LCA studies the use of resources and the consequent emissions of pollutants on the environment during the entire life of a product from raw materials exploitation, through production, use and treatment at the end of the life cycle - recycling and final disposal. This paper will provide an overview of the LCA results of various commercial polymer packaging materials, as well as the results of LCAs of biopolymer materials. Although LCA faces the problem of data heterogeneity, since some studies focused on individual segments of the analysis, while some related to all aspects of the process, as well with the problem of interpreting heterogeneous results, because the output parameters were arbitrarily selected by the researcher, still it could be concluded that the available LCA studies and environmental assessments support further development of biobased polymers. When comparing biopolymer materials with commercial synthetic polymers, they have advantages - lower consumption of fossil fuels and lower emission rate of greenhouse gases from the whole life cycle.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference20 articles.
1. Azapagic, A., Emsley, A., Hamerton, I. (2003). Design for the environment: the life cycle approach. In: Hamerton, I., editor. Polymers, the environment and sustainable development. 1st edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 125-154;
2. Belboom, S., Léonard, A. (2016). Does biobased polymer achieve better environmental impacts than fossil polymer? Comparison of fossil HDPE and biobased HDPE produced from sugar beet and wheat. Biomass and Bioenergy, 85, 159-167;
3. Bohlmann, M. (2004). Biodegradable Packaging Life-Cycle Assessment. Envoronmental Progress, 23 (4), 342-346;
4. Flanigan, L., Frischknecht, R., Montalbo, T. (2013). An Analysis of Life Cycle Assessment in Packaging for Food & Beverage Applications, United Nations Environment Programme and SETAC;
5. Gironi F, Piemonte V. (2010). Life cycle assessment of polylactic acid and PET bottles for drinking water. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 30 (3), 459-468;
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献