Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over crimes committed on the territory of Afghanistan

Author:

Radmanović JelenaORCID

Abstract

The subject of this paper is the territorial and personal aspects of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court regarding crimes committed on the territory or in connection with the armed conflict on the territory of Afghanistan. In 2020, the International Criminal Court determined that the conditions had been met for initiating an investigation into crimes committed in Afghanistan, or in connection with the armed conflict in Afghanistan. The paper is based on the analysis of positive regulations in the field of public international law and international criminal law, as well as linking the relevant provisions with the circumstances under which crimes were committed on the territory of Afghanistan and drawing conclusions about the fulfillment of necessary conditions for initiating criminal proceedings before the International Criminal Court. The result of the analysis leads to the conclusion that the conditions have been met for initiating an investigation into crimes committed in Afghanistan or in connection with the armed conflict on the territory of Afghanistan. The initiation of an investigation is particularly important in the context of the withdrawal of US military forces and the Taliban's takeover of power in Afghanistan. Namely, there is a real possibility that the newly formed government in Afghanistan will not be willing to cooperate with the prosecution and provide the necessary evidence related to the crimes in question, which directly affects the importance of conducting proceedings before the International Criminal Court.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

Genetics,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference70 articles.

1. Ambos, K. (2007). International Core Crimes, Universal Jurisdiction And § 153 et seq. The German Criminal Procedure Code: A Commentary On The Decisions Of The Federal Prosecutor General And The Stuttgart Higher Regional Court In The Abu Ghraib/Rumsfeld Case. Criminal Law Forum, vol. 18;

2. Ambos, K. (2009). Prosecuting Guantanamo in Europe: Can and Shall the Masterminds of the "Torture Memos" be Held Criminally Responsible on the Basis of Universal Jurisdiction?. Case W. Res. J. Int'l L., vol. 42;

3. Ambos, K. (2013). Treatise on International Criminal Law, Volume I: Foundations and General Part. Oxford: Oxford University Press;

4. Bassiouni, M. C. (1999). Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court, Cornell International Law Journal, vol. 32;

5. Bassiouni, M. C. (2012). Introduction to International Criminal Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers;

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Challenges for Criminal Law in the Context of the Aggression of the Russian Federation Against Ukraine;International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique;2024-04-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3