The assessment of individual risk of radicalization and violent extremism

Author:

Vuković Slaviša

Abstract

Modern counter-terrorism strategies include, among other preventive mechanisms, assessing the risk of radicalization and violent extremism. Undoubtedly, this is a very important preventive mechanism that should enable the timely identification of potentially dangerous individuals against whom further measures and actions should be taken to prevent them from joining terrorist groups or organizations and carrying out a terrorist attack. Although it is already well known that there is no universal profile of a terrorist, which does not support the efforts to establish reliable instruments for assessing the risk of radicalization and violent extremism, it is the fact that an increasing number of such instruments have been used in risk assessment and positive results are expected from them. The aim of this paper is to indicate the possibilities of practical application of such instruments based on the analysis of their characteristics as well as possible limitations. Such observations could be useful to national practitioners to improve risk assessment of potential threats, as well as to researchers to encourage and develop further research that is certainly a necessity in this domain.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference53 articles.

1. Augestad Knudsen, R. (2018). Measuring radicalisation: Risk assessment conceptualisations and practice in England and Wales. Behavioural Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 12(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2018.1509105;

2. Carlsson, C., Rostami, A., Mondani, H., Sturup, J., Sarnecki, J., & Edling, C. (2020). A lifecourse analysis of engagement in violent extremist groups. British Journal of Criminology, 60(1), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azz048;

3. Centar za slobodne izbore i demokratiju (CeSID). (2016). Istraživanje o pokretačima radikalizma i nasilnog ekstremizma među mladima u Srbiji. Centar za slobodne izbore i demokratiju (CeSID), Program Ujedinjenih nacija za razvoj (UNDP).;

4. Christmann, K. (2012). Preventing religious radicalisation and violent extremism: A systematic review of the research evidence. Youth Justice Board for England and Wales.;

5. Cole, J., Alison, E., Cole, B., & Alison, L. (2010). Guidance for identifying people vulnerable to recruitment into violent extremism. University of Liverpool, School of Psychology.;

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. الطريق لمكافحة التطرف: اكتشافه المبكر;ARAB JOURNAL FOR SECURITY STUDIES;2022-12-06

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3