Author:
Calado Barbosa,Perini-Santos Ernesto
Abstract
When and why do we need the indexical 'I'? Perry (1979) thinks that 'I' is an essential ingredient to the explanation and prediction of action. We need 'I' to classify the kind of belief that causes an agent to produce a new action. In his view, classifying the agent's belief in terms of 'I' makes sense because, when asked to explain her behavior, the agent will be disposed to say 'I'. Here, we argue that this dispositional assumption is problematic. The disposition to act according to an essential indexical and the disposition to make a speech act that contains 'I' are two very different things that are not always related. The most common circumstances in which we need to say 'I' to explain ourselves involve other agents: when we coordinate in joint actions or when we engage in self-talk to save face before the eyes of potential witnesses. Finally, we revisit Perry's famous messy shopper anecdote to offer a better story about why its main character is disposed to say 'I'.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference25 articles.
1. Austin, J. (1979). 3rd Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press;
2. Bloom, P. (2000). How Children Learn the Meaning of Words. Cambridge, MIT Press;
3. Campbell, J. (1994). Past, Space, and Self. Cambridge: MIT Press;
4. Campbell, J. (2003). The Role of Demonstratives in Action-Explanation. In Eilan, N., & Roessler, J. (eds.), Agency and Self-Awareness, Oxford: OUP, pp. 150-164;
5. Corazza, E. (2004). Reflecting the Mind -Indexicality and Quasi-Indexicality. Oxford: Oxford University Press;