Abstract
In addition to the author's scientific work, the study -based on pragmatic experiences -analyses the factors that characterized Central European countries before the change of regime (1990) and then the foreign economic model through which Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Slovakia ("Visegrád 4") reached EU membership in 2004. The study highlighted that, with different depths, in all countries concerned economic policies were characterized by liberal bankruptcy regulations and strict conditions of competition, so that they could prove their ability to meet the condition of a functioning market economy for EU membership1. The export-oriented model, built on efficient inflow of foreign direct investment and high-tech in the early 1990s, was implemented by the late 1990s to demonstrate that these states were ready to meet another condition of EU membership, namely to meet the challenges of the internal market.2 This transformation represented a problem for the current account balance in the 1990s (mainly due to the loss of traditional national export capacities) only in the middle of the decade, and it was only at the end of the decade that trade balances showed surplus with the EU. The total external equilibrium of the Visegrád countries was maintained by the fact that the inflow of FDI had not yet started to conclude in the withdrawal of profits from recent investments in Central Europe, and the countervailing effect of EU net transfers, which began to arrive later parallelly with the start of the withdrawal of FDI dividends. The CEFTA co-operation concluded in 1992 followed the economic liberalization timetable of that of the Visegrád Four with the EU parallelly but did not go beyond its depth for political prudence, thus providing full opening to each other only after and through EU membership, more precisely the liberalisation in services or in sensitive agricultural trade. The CEFTA treaty was expanded to the Balkans after 1995 and has been and is still a good example for countries that do not want to stay in an ex-Soviet or ex-Yugoslav economic integration but is a good method for them to prepare for the earliest possible EU membership.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering
Reference23 articles.
1. Antonis-Kosma Adam, Theodora, S., McHugh, Jimmy, "Trade-Liberalization Strategies: What Could South-eastern Europe Learn from the CEFTA and BAFTA?", IMF Studies, 03/239, 2003, 1-32.;
2. Az Antall-kormány programja 1990. Az Antall-kormány külpolitikai programja. https://www.parlament.hu/naplo34/005/0050004.html;
3. Iván, Berend-T-György,Ránki, "Közép-Kelet-Európa gazdasági fejlődése a 19-20. században", KJK, Budapest, 1976;
4. Blahó András, Szita, János, "Economic Cooperation of Socialist Countries in the Framework of the CMEA", MKKE, Textbook Publisher, 1984, 64.;
5. Bod Péter Ákos, "A magyar gazdaságpolitika 1989 és 2019 között", Gazdaság és Pénzügy, Budapest, March 6, 2019, 16-38.;