General practitioners' attitudes towards research in general medicine

Author:

Petrov-Kiurski MilorankaORCID,Živanović SlavoljubORCID

Abstract

Introduction: General medicine is a specific scientific discipline and research is a constituting part of each medical discipline. Objective: We reviewed general physicians` (GPs) attitudes towards scientific research and their reasons for participating or not participating in them. Method: We made a specific questionnaire for the sake of this research. We got the data on age, gender, service periods, place of work (city/country), and specialty: GP or specialist in general medicine, as well as their opinions on research. We forwarded the questionnaire to 550 physicians' email addresses in November 2016. The acquired data were statistically processed using SPSS 20.0 for Windows. Results: The questionnaire was filled out by 233 physicians, of whom 83,3% were women, 67% specialists in general medicine, 68,7% physicians worked in city clinics; the average age of the participants was 46.46±10.29, the average service period 17.85±10.99 years. Out of the total number, 67.8% of the participants thought research was important and useful, even more so by specialists in general medicine, which was statistically significant (p=0.000). There were 71.2% of the physicians who already participated in the research projects, mostly working in the cities (p=0.008), physicians older than 50 (p=0.000), and physicians with service period >20 years (p=0,000). Physicians 30 or younger (p=0.017) and physicians with ≤ 10 years of service (p=0.002) thought research improved work quality. The most frequent reason for not participating in the research projects was lack of time due to a patient and administration overload. The most frequent reason for participating, for physicians with 11-20 and over 20 years of service, was improving work quality (p=0.007). Conclusion: Physicians think research is necessary and useful in general medicine and it improves work quality. The most frequent reason for not participating in the research projects was lack of time due to a patient and administration overload.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3