Tooth size discrepancy: Digital vs manual measurement

Author:

Džemidžić Vildana,Nukić Velida,Tiro Alisa

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of overall and anterior Bolton's ratio measurements obtained with an intraoral scanner compared to standard caliper measurements on plaster models. Material and Methods: This study included 33 subjects (18 female and 15 male), aged 12 to 18 years. All subjects were taken impression for the purpose of making study plaster models. In addition, all subjects underwent intraoral scanning for the purpose of creating digital models. Tooth width was measured with a caliper on plaster models, while digital models were analyzed using Cerec Ortho SW 2.0.2 software. The overall and anterior Bolton ratios were derived using both methods. Statistical data processing was performed using an independent t-test. Results: The results obtained using these two methods for measuring the anterior and overall Bolton ratio showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the measurements obtained on plaster models and the measurements obtained by intraoral scanning. For the overall Bolton ratio, T-test was 0.828 and is not statistically significant (p<0.05). The value of T-test for the anterior Bolton ratio was 0.001 and it was also not statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusions: Determination the overall and anterior Bolton ratio using an intraoral scanner is an accurate and acceptable method for clinical work in orthodontics.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference19 articles.

1. Wedrychowska-Szulc B, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Stepień P (2010). "Overall and anterior Bolton ratio in Class I, II, and III orthodontic patients". Eur J Orthod. 32 (3): 313-318. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp114. PMID: 20018795;

2. Bolton WA (1958). "Disharmony In Tooth Size and Its Relation to The Analysis And Treatment Of Malocclusion". Angle Orthod. 28 (3): 113-130. doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1958)028<0113:DITSAI>2.0.CO;2;

3. Crosby DR, Alexander CG (1989). "The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups". Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 95 (6): 457-461. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90408-3. PMID: 2729195;

4. Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR (2004). "The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models". Angle Orthod. 74 (3): 298-303. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)074<0298:TAAROM>2. 0.CO;2. PMID: 15264638;

5. Schirmer UR, Wiltshire WA (1997). "Manual and computeraided space analysis: a comparative study". Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 112 (6): 676-680. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70234-8. PMID: 9423701;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3