Enforcement of decisions on child residence and contact orders concerning the child in light of novelties in Croatian law and European law

Author:

Aras-Kramar Slađana

Abstract

The paper contains an analysis and discussion of the novelties introduced by the Croatian Family Act of 2015 in the enforcement proceedings for handing over the child to the person entitled to custody and exercising access rights with the child, taking into account the procedural subjectivity and position of the child (especially her/his right to express opinions and thus influence the course of enforcement proceedings) as well as the significance of the methods of professional work of the social welfare center and family mediation on this procedure. Then, the author discusses and evaluates the new solutions of the Brussels II ter Regulation in the field of recognition and enforcement of decisions in cases of parental responsibility with a cross-border element in the light of procedural rights of the child and the need to achieve effective enforcement, as well as of the circumstances of grave risk to the child that may affect the enforcement of decisions in parental responsibility cases issued in another EU Member State. In the concluding part of the paper, the author presents a summary synthesis of the main results of the research, as well as certain de lege ferenda recommendations.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference34 articles.

1. Aras, S. (2014). Položaj djeteta u postupku prema novom Obiteljskom zakonu. U J. Barbić (Ur.), Novo uređenje obiteljskih sudskih postupaka (str. 35-65). Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti;

2. Aras Kramar, S. (2017). Revizija Briselske uredbe II bis o nadležnosti, priznanju i ovrsi u bračnim predmetima i predmetima roditeljske odgovornosti: novi izazovi pred državama članicama. Revija za pravo i ekonomiju. 18(1), 138-162;

3. Carpaneto, L. (2019). Impact of the Best Interests of the Child on the Brussels II ter Regulation. U E. Bergamini i C. Ragni (Ur.), Fundamental Rights and Best Interests of the Child in Transnational Families (str. 265-285). Cambridge/Antwerp/ Chicago: Intersentia;

4. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Official Journal of the EU 2012. Br. C 326;

5. Council of Europe, Committee of Ministers. Recommendation No. R (91) 9 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on emergency measures in family matters. No. R 9 (1991);

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3