The relationship between the prohibition of refoulement and the prohibition of collective expulsion in the context of access to territory: Standards of the European Court of Human Rights and their relevance for the legal system of the Republic of Serbia

Author:

Čučković BojanaORCID

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between the prohibition of refoulement contained in Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens guaranteed by Article 4 of Protocol No. 4. After identifying common and distinctive elements of the two provisions, the author tests the main hypothesis that the prohibition of refoulement and the prohibition of collective expulsion are separate prohibitions with an independent existence but that they are intertwined in a variety of ways in the specific context of access to territory. The analysis has led to the conclusion that, despite the open questions that remain, the linkage between the two provisions can be used for corrective purposes, particularly in light of the recent lowering of standards by the ECtHR in relation to the prohibition of collective expulsion. It is also suggested that the difference between the positive obligations contained in the two ECHR articles has no significance for the authorities acting on the ground. As the protection afforded by the two prohibitions is complementary , national authorities must ensure that both border practices at and outside the means of legal entry comply with the ECHR standards in relation to both provisions.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Engineering,Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Reference20 articles.

1. Alinikula, E. (2021). Migrants at the Borders of Europe: The European Framework for Protection against Pushbacks and Collective Expulsions. Master's Thesis. Abo Akademi, Faculty of Social Sciences, Business and Economics;

2. Boková, T., Bražina, R. (2021). Expulsion of Aliens, Non-Refoulement and Issues related to (Administrative) Discretion. Institutes Administrationis. 1. 90-103;

3. Carlier, J.Y., Leboeuf, L. (2020). The Prohibition of Collective Expulsion as an Individualisation Requirement. In Moraru, M., Cornelisse, G., De Bruycker, P. (eds), Law and Judicial Dialogue on the Return of Irregular Migrants from the European Union (pp. 455-473). Oxford: Hart Publishing;

4. Ciliberto, G. (2021). A Brand-New Exclusionary Clause to the Prohibition of Collective Expulsion of Aliens: The Applicant's Own Conduct in N.D. and N.T. v. Spain. Human Rights Law Review. 21. 203-220;

5. Čučković, B. (2022). Pravo osoba u potrebi za međunarodnom zaštitom na pristup teritoriji: (ne)jasni standardi Evropskog suda za ljudska prava. In Lilić, S. (ur.), Perspektive implementacije evropskih standarda u pravni sistem Srbije (127-145). Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu Pravni fakultet;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3