Peculiarities of the action for annulment against decisions of the EU decentralised agencies' Boards of Appeal

Author:

Mladenović SlađanaORCID

Abstract

There are ten EU decentralised agencies empowered to take decisions that are intended to produce legal effect vis-à-vis private persons in the context of regulating the internal market. In order to ensure effective protection of the rights of private persons against these agencies, EU law establishes mechanisms of internal and external legal control of their decisions. Internal control is achieved through the mechanism of administrative appeals before the Boards of Appeal (BoAs) established within each of the agencies. The BoA's decision on the appeal is final and legally binding on the parties to the appeal proceedings. It is therefore the subject matter of an action for annulment before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which ensures external control of the agency decisions. The action for annulment of the BoA's decision is subject to the same rules that apply to the annulment of any act of EU law intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties, but there are certain peculiarities in the context of the judicial review of the agency decisions. These peculiarities exist in four aspects of the action for annulment, namely: 1) the jurisdiction of the CJEU; 2) the grounds for annulment - the scope and intensity of the review performed by the BoA; 3) the effects of the first-instance judgment - alteration of the BoA's decision in some agencies; and 4) the appeal against the first instance judgment - filtering mechanism under Art. 58a of the CJEU Statute. These peculiarities are the subject of this paper.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference33 articles.

1. Alberti, J. (2022). The Position of Boards of Appeal: Between Functional Continuity and Independence. In Chamon, M., Volpato, A. and Eliantonio, M. (eds.), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review? (pp. 245-272). Oxford: Oxford University Press;

2. Alberti, J. (2019). The draft amendments to CJEU's Statute and the future challenges of administrative adjudication in the EU. Federalismi.it -Rivista di diritto pubblico italiano, comparato, europeo. 3. 1-32;

3. Chamon, M. (2016). EU Agencies: Legal and Political Limits to the Transformation of the EU Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press;

4. Chirulli, P., De Lucia, L. (2021). Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration: Protection of Rights versus Preservation of Autonomy. London; New York: Routledge; Turin: Giappichelli;

5. Court of Justice of the European Union [CJEU]. (2023). Statistics concerning the judicial activity of the Court of Justice, Retrieved 1 September 2023, from https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-03/stats_cour_2022_ en.pdf;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3