Abstract
Background: The background of this research encompasses contemporary cultural policy issues and their factors of influence, with a special focus on cultural participation processes. The sphere of culture provides the fundamental base for reading and changing the paradigmatic paths through the contents and acts of formal and informal stakeholders. Culture is deeply interlinked with other departments of the entire economy by connections with feedback loops. The impacts of culture on the socio-economic and natural environment, as the "fourth pillar" of sustainable development, are recognized on the international level by theory, expert groups, and practice. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to bring about a deeper understanding of participatory processes and their importance for strategic priority areas of cultural policy development. Study design/methodology/approach: Our study design included institutional analysis, starting from the regulatory framework that reflects cultural policy and its strategic goals, by involving previous relevant theoretical research including the ICET model. Another objective of the paper is to answer a range of questions. What are participation processes' main characteristics and challenges in culture and cultural policy development? Is there a relationship between these challenges? How to achieve desirable cultural and institutional integrative transformations in order to accomplish the strategic priority areas of cultural policy? We bring the conclusions based on theoretic and empirical overview of new empirical research findings based on the survey conducted in 2022 for the need of EPICA research project.1 Findings/conclusions: The findings of this research lead us to recognition, conceptualization and understanding of the existing participatory processes in culture, towards inspiring the future modelling of more integrative strategic and systemic solutions to reflect desirable and harmonized development. Limitations/future research: The limitations of research reflect future endeavour to contribute to reforming the field of culture (by formal and informal means) through more robust horizontal integration with other departments, to achieve sustainable and coherent effects through linking strategies, new forms of participation, decentralization, arm's length principle, and degrowth policy.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,General Medicine
Reference53 articles.
1. Belfiore, E. (2020). Whose cultural value? Representation, power and creative industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 26(3), 383-397. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2018.1495713;
2. Boon, W. P. C., Edler, J., & Robinson, D. K. R. (2020). Market formation in the context of transitions: A comment on the transitions agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34(3), 346-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.006;
3. Castoriadis, C. (1997). The imaginary institution of society. Mit Press;
4. Castro, C. J. (2004). Sustainable Development. Organization & Environment, 17(2), 195-225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604264910;
5. Constitution Law. (2022). Retrieved August 25, 2022, from http://www.pravno-informacionisistem.rs/SlGlasnikPortal/eli/rep/sgrs/skupstina/ustav/2 006/98/1/reg;
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献