An example of methodological concept of informal power research in a work organisation

Author:

Vukajlović Mile

Abstract

In this paper, the authors present a methodological concept of informal power research, on example of the possibility of its use in the organization of higher education. Gender equality means that women and men have equal opportunities, rights and obligations in their social, professional and family environment. Although it is often reduced to an equal distribution of paid and unpaid work, a broader concept includes many more indicators such as the political dimensions of gender and physical integrity of men and women. Some studies only stresses the dimension of equality, while the other focuses on the evaluation of the same gender roles and the transformation of existing practices, but most researchers in this field agree that gender equality has many different dimensions that can not be subsumed under a single one-dimensional indicator. Sociologists usually recognize gender inequality in unequal access of women and men to social resources, money, time, social division of labor and the labor market. In this paper we consider the faculties as an organization of higher education, ie. organization of work, as the area of human social organization in which different interests of individuals and groups condition relations of cooperation and conflict, and investigating whether the formal power that women have within the organization is limited or completely blocked by the informal power that originate from the traditional patterns of behavior and authority.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference22 articles.

1. Blagojević-Hjuston, M. (2012). Žene i muškarci u Srbiji: Šta nam govore brojevi? (p. 77). Beograd: UNDP - Program ujedinjenih nacija za razvoj;

2. Branković, S. (2007). Uvod u metodologiju: Kvalitativni metodi itraživanja društvneih pojava. Beograd: Megatrend univerzitet primenjenih nauka;

3. Bryman, A. (2005). Research Methods and Organization Studies. New York: Routledge;

4. Filozofski fakultet u Nišu. STATUT FILOZOFSKOG FAKULTETA U NIŠU (2013);

5. Goldsby, M. G. (1998). New Organization Forms: An Examination of Alienation and Ideology in the Postindustrial Workplace. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3