In vitro evaluation of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

Author:

Toneva-Stojmenova Verica,Popovska Lidija,Kokalanov Vasko,Toneva-Nikolova Aleksandra,Apostoloski Pavle

Abstract

Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth have a worse biomechanical condition compared to intact vital teeth. The literature shows that with endodontic treatment, tooth tissue is lost and fracture resistance is reduced. This paper presents the findings. Aim of study was to determine difference in fracture resistance between intact teeth and endodontically treated and obturated teeth and which type of fracture is the most common. Materials and Methods: For the purpose of this research, 20 extracted single-root intact teeth were used. By random selection, the samples were divided into 2 groups: G1 (negative control group, n = 5) - intact teeth, G2 (experimental group, n = 15) - treated with Hedstrom file + obturated with Gutta-Percha and Endomethasone N. The samples were subjected to compressive pressure on the Universal testing machine, until the moment of breaking. Results: The average pressure value ( ) at which fracture occurred in G1 was 849 N, and in G2 it was 772.33 N. The standard deviation (s) of the pressure value at which the fracture in G1 occurred was 246.86 N, and for G2 it is 810.74 N. The largest percentage of samples had multiple fracture lines (in 100% of G1 samples; in 53.3% of G2 samples). Conclusion: In all groups, the most common fractures according to direction were combined, and according to complexity multiple. Although the pressure values at which the fractures occurred in the first group were significantly higher than in the second group, from the statistical analyses (Student's t-test with a value of 0.69, CI 95%, p < 0.05), we conclude that there is no noticeably significant difference in the average value of the pressure at which a fracture occurs in both groups.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3