Spatial limitation of jurisdiction in administrative proceedings

Author:

Lončar Zoran

Abstract

The competence of administrative bodies is an important precondition for the lawful conducting of administrative proceedings. About this kind of competence must be taken care ex officio during the entire procedure, and violations of rules on competence represents a significant violation of the rules in administrative procedure. Among the numerous novelties introduced in the administrative procedure by the Law on General Administrative Procedure from 2016 there are certain changes in rules on determining the competence of the body conducting the administrative procedure. The new rules on the competence of bodies in administrative procedure, and especially on the spatial limitation of competence, cannot be assessed as a significant improvement of the legal regime of administrative procedure, given that some of them represent a significant limiting factor for effective and economical management of administrative procedures. The future legislative revision of the administrative procedure should therefore be used to regulate, above all, issues of legal aid between administrative bodies, as well as administrative bodies and courts, and in particular the rules on spatial limitation of jurisdiction, which would enable the administrative body to, in case of urgency, take official action on territory of another body, with the duty to inform the authority in charged with territory where the action was taken. Careful and fundamental amendments to the legal provisions on the competence of administrative bodies would provide the necessary legal preconditions for efficient and economical conducting of administrative proceedings, and the rights and legal interests of the parties, as well as their legal security, would no longer be denied.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference30 articles.

1. Vučetić Dejan, Administrative Proceedings in the Habsburg Succession Countries, Chapter IX - Serbia, (in: Zbigniew Kmieciak), Lodz University Press, Wolters Kluwer, 2020, 181-198;

2. Vučetić Dejan, "Delotvornost procesnih rešenja u prvostepenom upravnom postupku", Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 91/2021, 75-96;

3. Vučetić Dejan, "Evropska upravno-procesna pravila i opšti upravni postupak Republike Srbije", Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu 68/2014, 175-186;

4. Dimitrijević Predrag, Vučetić Dejan, "Delotvornost vanrednih pravnih sredstava u upravnom postupku", Zbornik "Unifikacija prava i pravna sigurnost" (ur. Jelena Perović), Tom 2, Beograd 2020, 227-249;

5. Dimitrijević Predrag, Upravno pravo, opšti deo, Sven, Niš 2016;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3