The restrictions of the right to inspect the case file in Bosnia and Herzegovina in light of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights

Author:

Avdić FarukORCID

Abstract

This paper aims to assess the compliance of the provisions of the criminal procedural legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina dealing with the restrictions of the right to inspect the case file with the standards developed in the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The working hypothesis laid out in this paper is that the right of the prosecutor to unilaterally restrict the defense right to access the case file during the investigation and to unilaterally decide which evidence he will use as the basis for the indictment does not satisfy the requirements stemming from the right to a fair trial. The starting point of this paper is the analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Afterward, the paper turns to the consideration of the provisions of the criminal procedural legislation of Bosnia and Herzegovina dealing with the restrictions of the right to inspect the case file. In that purpose, this paper employs normative and formal dogmatic legal methods in analyzing the particulars of its subject. The conclusion of the paper is that the law of Bosnia and Herzegovina when it comes to the restrictions of the right to inspect the case file is not in line with the standards of the European Court of Human Rights. For this reason, there is a need for the amending of the Criminal Procedure Codes in force in Bosnia and Herzegovina with the aim of making these Codes compliant with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in that respect.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference33 articles.

1. Ambos, K. 2009. Confidential Investigations (Article 54(3)(E) ICC Statute) vs. Disclosure Obligations: The Lubanga Case And National Law. New Criminal Law Review: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal, 12(4), pp. 543-568;

2. Bayer, V. 1972. Jugoslavensko krivično procesno pravo: Knjiga prva: Uvod u teoriju krivičnog procesnog prava. Zagreb: Školska knjiga;

3. Brants, C. & Franken, S. 2009. The Protection of Fundamental Human Rights in Criminal Process-General Report. Utrecht Law Review, 5(2), pp. 7-65;

4. Bubalović, T. 2008. Novela Zakona o kaznenom postupku BiH od 17. juna 2008. godine -pozitivna rješenja i iznevjerena očekivanja. Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu, 15(2), pp. 1129-1157;

5. Bubalović, T. 2012. "Jednakost oružja" i njegova afirmacija u okviru prava na obranu (regionalni komparativni osvrt), U: Petrović, A. & Jovanović, I. (ur.), Savremene tendencije krivičnog procesnog prava u Srbiji i regionalna krivičnoprocesna zakonodavstva (normativni i praktični aspekti). Beograd: Misija OEBS u Srbiji, pp. 215-235;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3