Abstract
The field of nanotechnology is at the forefront of a scientific revolution, where the term "nano" transcends mere size and opens the door to enormous possibilities. In the context of drug development, the selection of a suitable drug delivery system (corresponding to a certain active pharmaceutical ingredient) is a pivotal decision. Accordingly, nanosystems have emerged as a promising avenue, offering innovative solutions, and gaining recognition for addressing healthcare issues. While these products hold immense promise, they have faced certain complexities in their translation from the preclinical to the clinical setting, reflected in the lack of proper assessment protocols for quality and safety aspects and, consequently, an insufficiently defined regulatory environment. Since the groundbreaking US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of liposomal doxorubicin in 1995, approximately 80 nanomedicine products have received regulatory approval so far. Recent attention has gravitated toward lipid-based nanomedicines, particularly in the development of mRNA vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic, further highlighting their significance. However, the relatively modest number of approved nanomedicines compared to the extensive research efforts raises important questions and underscores areas of uncertainty. This article provides an overview of the challenges in defining nanomedicines, their properties, the complexities of regulatory frameworks, and the imperative for standardized characterization protocols.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Pharmaceutical Science,Pharmacology
Reference40 articles.
1. Weltring KM, Gouze N, Martin N, Pereira N, Baanante I, Gramatica F. Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda for Nanomedicine 2016-2030 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Sep 30]. Available from: https://etp-nanomedicine.eu/about-nanomedicine/strategic-research-and-innovation-agenda;
2. Mitragotri S, Lammers T, Bae YH, Schwendeman S, De Smedt SC, Leroux JC, et al. Drug delivery research for the future: expanding the nano horizons and beyond. J Control Release. 2017;246:183-4;
3. Dahnier F. To exploit the tumor microenvironment: Since the EPR effect fails in the clinic, what is the future of nanomedicine? J Control Release. 2016;244:108-21;
4. Wilhelm S, Tavares AJ, Dai Q, Ohta S, Audet J, Dvorak HF, Chan WC. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat Rev Mat. 2016;1:1-12;
5. Onoue S, Yamada S, Chan HK. Nanodrugs: pharmacokinetics and safety. Int J Nanomed. 2104;9:1025;