The problem of the legitimacy object in socio-legal research

Author:

Bezbradica AnjaORCID

Abstract

Although traditionally a political science topic, in the last three decades legitimacy has become a subject of interest for researchers in the field of sociology of law who deal with the issue of compliance with law. Significant differences among researchers in this field, initially concerning the definition of legitimacy and subsequently its operationalization, frequently result in the inability to compare findings across various studies. To establish a more coherent conceptual and methodological framework for future socio-legal research on legitimacy, we identified three areas with the greatest ambiguity: 1. object of legitimacy, 2. operationalization of legitimacy in empirical research, and 3. sources of legitimacy. This paper aims to examine the first question. It employs conceptual analysis as a method to explore the objects of legitimacy relevant to legal behavior studies. Through a review of theoretical literature and notable empirical studies, the paper asserts that legitimacy can be attributed to three distinct objects: 1. institutions, 2. officials, and 3. legal acts. We can speak of institutional legitimacy the authority that implements the law is the one towards which the support of the relevant public is directed, which is why people feel compelled to obey its directives. The legitimacy of officials signifies the support directed toward individuals occupying institutional positions and their particular policies. Legal acts may be legitimate for both substantive and formal reasons. Substantive legitimacy of legal acts arises when the public agrees with the content of their norms. In the case formal legitimacy of legal acts, individuals may feel obligated to adhere to laws and other legal acts due to their formal validity, meaning they were enacted by the competent authority in the prescribed procedure. These three legitimations intertwine and condition each other, which is why they need to be studied in interaction. Since compliance with law can derive from the legitimacy of different objects, it is important for socio-legal studies to empirically explore, within each context, legitimacy of which object serves as the primary motivator for behavior, along with explaining their interplay.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference28 articles.

1. Kelzen, Hans. 2010. Opšta teorija države i prava. Beograd: JP "Službeni glasnik" i Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu;

2. Hart, Herbert. 2013. Pojam prava. Beograd: JP "Službeni glasnik" i Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu;

3. Berger, Joseph, Ridgeway, Cecilia L., Fisek, M. Hamit & Norman, Robert Z. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63(3), pp. 379 -405;

4. Bovan Saša B. 2014. Osnovi sociologije prava. Beograd: Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu;

5. DeCremer, David & Tyler, Tom R. 2005. "Managing group behavior: the interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation", In Mark P. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 151 -218). New York: Academic;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3