Author:
Milosavljević Zoran,Maksimović Andrijana
Abstract
The authors of the paper deal with immigration policies, migration management, migration management policy via case study based on the example of two purposefully chosen countries which have diametrically opposite immigration policies. The aim is to see up to which extent and whether these countries are interested into integrating immigrants into their social, legal, political and cultural space, through their institutional capacities, by the means of comparative analysis of German and Hungarian immigration policies, their social, demographic and economic structure, and their cultural and security policies. By defining concepts of migration, immigration, integration, immigration policy, migration management, immigration border management, the authors precisely pinpoint the differences, and the causes of those differences, in the policies towards migrants in these two countries.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference18 articles.
1. Bigo, D., Guild, E. (2005). Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement into and within Europe. London: Ashgate;
2. Bayer, L. (2016). Hungary's 'Zero refugee' strategy. Politico. Bruselles;
3. Bendel, P. (2014). Coordinating immigrant integration in Germany. Mainstreaming at the federal and local levels. Migration Policy Institute;
4. Bjerre, L., Helbling, M., Römer, F. (2015). Conceptualizing and Measuring Immigration Policies: A Comparative Perspective. International migration Review, 49 (3). 555-600;
5. Carrera S., (2007). The EU Border Management Strategy FRONTEX and the Challenges of Irregular Immigration in the Canary Islands. CEPS Working Document No. 261. Available from: https://www.cidob.org/ca/content/download/26415/320701/file/Border+Management+Str ategy+by+Carrera.pdf;