Author:
Osmanspahić Adnan,Despotović Mile,Hadživuković Natalija,Pavlović Jelena,Matović Sandra,Živanović Srđan,Zlatanović Milena,Despotović Milena,Kucurski Ljubiša
Abstract
Objective. Long-term care represents a series of health and social care services that are provided at home or in an institutional environment to people with reduced functional capacity (reduced physical and/or cognitive abilities) who need support in performing daily activities, and who depend on the help of others for a long time period. The goal of the research was to examine the quality of life of users with long-term health care, with a special focus on comparing the quality of life between people placed institutionally and outside of the institution. Methods. The research was designed according to the principle of a cross-sectional study. In the research, a general questionnaire and a scale for assessing the quality of life Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) were used. Among the statistical tests, the ch2 square test was used. The usual value of p<0.05 was taken as the level of statistical significance. Results. Subjects who were institutionalized had statistically significantly lower values of domains and summary scores of quality of life compared to subjects whose health care took place outside of institutions, whereby the difference was observed in physical functioning (p<0.001), social functioning (p=0.003) and mental health summary score (p=0.015). Conclusion. Users of long-term health care placed in an institution had significantly worse physical functioning, a higher level of limitations due to physical problems, worse general health, a lower level of social functioning, as well as mental health.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference17 articles.
1. Badjun M. Informal long-term care for the elderly and infirm. Newsletter No. 100. Zagreb: Institute for Public Finance, 2015. (https://www.ijf.hr/upload/files/file/ENG/ newsletter/100.pdf);
2. Matković G, Stanić K. Social protection in old age: long-term care and social pensions. Belgrade: Faculty of Economics, Finance and Administration FEFA: Center for Social Policy: Government of the Republic of Serbia, Team for Social Inclusion and Poverty Reduction, 2014. (in Serbian);
3. Kreitzer MJ, Monsen KA, Nandram S, De Blok J. Buurtzorgnederland: a global model of social innovation, change, and whole-systems healing. Glob Adv Health Med 2015; 4: 40-4;
4. Ribarić L. Comparison of psychiatric treatment in homes for the elderly and infirm: Rijeka: University of Rijeka, Faculty of Health Studies, Department of Midwifery, 2020;
5. Laklija M, Rusac S, Žganec N. Trends in care for the elderly in the Republic of Croatia and in the countries of the European Union. Rev Soc Policy 2008; 15: 171-88;