Abstract
Introduction/Aim. Anatomically insignificant stenosis of coronary arteries obtained on coronary angiography, in numerous cases can show hemodynamic significance and as such cause ischemic myocardial changes. The goal was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (SPECT MPI) in the detection of hemodinamically significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with moderate risk for ischemia, without previously detected coronary disease. Patients and methodology. The study included 258 patients, of which 54% females and 46% males, with an average age of 59.0 ± 10.1 years. SPECT MPI was done by a two-day protocol with 99 mTc-MIBI. The pathological finding was the existence of perfusion defects. The physical stress test was done by Bruce protocol. Coronary angiography (CA) was performed according to a standard protocol in patients with pathological SPECT MPI findings (n = 128). Anatomically significant coronary artery narrowing was > 70%. Stenoses from 30% to 69% were considered hemodynamically significant in patients with reversible perfusion defects on SPECT MPI. Results. The sensitivity (SE) of SPECT MPI was 89%, specificity (SP) 42%, positive predictive value (PPV) 86%, negative predictive value (NPV) 50%, and total diagnostic accuracy (ACC) was 74% when the results were compared with stenosis > 70%. By including stenosis from 30% to 69%, the obtained values of diagnostic indicators of SPECT MPI reliability were: SE 91%; SP 100%; PPV 100%; NPV 50% and ACC 91%. Conclusion. With CA only, it is not possible to prove the existence of hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses from 30% to 69%, which represents a recruitment range for developing ischemia. SPECT MPI shows high SE, SP, PPV, and ACC in detecting the existence of left ventricular myocardium perfusion disorder in either stenosis of coronary arteries with or without anatomically significant value.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference35 articles.
1. Hung MJ, Hu P, Hung MY. Coronary Artery Spasm: review and update. Int J Med Sci 2014;11:1161-71. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.9623;
2. Crossman DC. The pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia. Heart 2004;90:576-80. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2003.029017;
3. Dangas G, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al., Preintervention arterial remodeling as an independent predictor of target lesion revascularization after non-stent coronary intervention. An analysis of 777 lesions with intravascular ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1999;99:3149-54. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.99.24.3149;
4. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: a report of the American college of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on coronary angiography). J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00126-6;
5. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA Guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST segment myocardial infarction -Summary article: J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1366-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02336-7;