Abstract
I aim to show that, contrary to standard deflationary or eliminativist theories of the self, we can argue from the phenomenology of pre-reflective self-awareness for the thesis that subjects of experience are substances. The phenomenological datum of subjectivity points to a specific metaphysical structure of our experience, that is, towards the substance view rather than the bundle or the minimal self view. Drawing on modern philosophical accounts of pre-reflective self-awareness, mineness and (self-) acquaintance, I will argue that a subject is aware of being the one individual who has many experiences and that it is revealed to the subject that it is the bearer of experiences and their unifier. The subject is present in pre-reflective awareness and known as the subject of experiences, and even this minimal self-awareness gives us reason to favour the substance view. Thus, one can demonstrate how the debates on the phenomenology of pre-reflective self-awareness and the metaphysics of selfhood intersect.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference43 articles.
1. Billon, A. (2017). Basic Self-Awareness. European Journal of Philosophy, 25 (3), 732-763;
2. Chalmers, D. (2015). Panpsychism and panprotopsychism. In Alter, T. and Nagasawa, Y. (eds.), Consciousness in the Physical World: Perspectives on Russellian Monism, pp. 246-277. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
3. Chisholm, R. (1969). On the observability of the self. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 30(1): 7-21;
4. Dainton, B. (2008). The Phenomenal Self, Oxford: Oxford University Press;
5. Duncan, M. (2015): We Are Acquainted With Ourselves. Philosophical Studies 172/9: 2531-2549;
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献