Abstract
Starting from the thesis that critical discourse studies, with their qualitative, critical and explanatory approach to the study of political communication, represent a valuable complement to the dominant approaches that privilege the positivist paradigm and quantitative research, in this paper we tried to provide more complex insights into the scientific contributions of these studies to the study of political discourse, through observing the specifics of their theoretical-methodological frameworks, analytical categories and interpretive procedures. For this purpose, some of the key features of Teun van Dijk's sociocognitive approach, Paul Chilton's cognitive-linguistic approach, Ruth Wodak's discursive-historical approach and Norman Fairclough's dialectical-relational argumentative approach were considered. In the introductory part of the paper, we provided an overview of the general distinctive features, main starting points and research interests of the critical analysis of political discourse, as well as an insight into the basic dilemma related to the scope of the content of the term "political discourse". The central part of the work consists of two complementary parts. In the first part, we started from the presentation of the analytical aspects of the following levels and dimensions of the political discourse structure: topics, superstructures or textual schemata, local semantics, lexicon, syntax, rhetoricand speech acts. Using an analytical-synthetic approach, we connected the semantic-grammatical dimensions of the textual level and the cognitive-pragmatic dimensions of the discursive level of production and analysis of political discourse. The second part of the central part of the work is focused on the presentation of the theoretical framework of the argumentative approach to political discourse, as a kind of upgrade and reframing of existing conceptual settings and analytical categories. In the concluding review of the insights reached in the article, as the main scientific contribution of critical studies of political discourse, we singled out the way in which is achieved the synthesis of systemic, but contextually sensitive textual analysis on the one hand, and descriptive, normative and explanatory viewpoints of critical social research, on the other.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference36 articles.
1. Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: a critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;
2. Chilton Paul and Christina Schaffner. 1997 "Discourse and Politics", Discourse as Social Interaction Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction Volume 2. ed. Teun A. van Dijk, 206-230. First published in 1997. Reprinted 1997, 1998, 2000. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications;
3. Chilton, Paul. 2004. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://rmit. libguides.com/ebooks/taylorfrancis;
4. Chilton, Paul and Christina Schäffner. 2002. "Introduction: Themes and principles in the analysis of political discourse". Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse, eds. Chilton Paul and Christina Schäffner, 1-41. Amsterdam: Benjamins;
5. Dunmire, Patricia. 2012. "Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the Politics of Language". Language and Linguistics Compass 6/11, 735-751. https://compass.onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/lnc3.365;