Abstract
Introduction/purpose: Destabilization of critical resources (CRs) or critical infrastructure (CI) important for the stability of the state can be dangerous for society, economy, and especially national security. Disruption of one CI object or one of its parts often affects and causes disruption of other dependent CI, because the modern society has become a "networked society". The paper proposes a model for quantifying and defining the interdependence between different CIs and their priorities, based on statements of experts. Methods 9 : The proposed methods that combine the Laboratory for Testing and Evaluation of Decision Making (DEMATEL) and the Analytical Network Process (ANP) have been successfully modified by fuzzy logic theory in this work. Results: Integrating multiple methods into a unique input data analysis model significantly affects the change in ranking. Conclusion: The work contributes to military science in making strategic decisions related to national security management through increasing the resilience of CRs and the societies that rely on them.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference32 articles.
1. Berlovsky, V. & Alexandrov, B. 2022. Kriticheskaja infrastruktura kak ob"ekt obespechenija nacional'noj bezopasnosti SshA. Pentagonus [online]. Available at: http://pentagonus.ru/publ/po_rodam_vojsk/obshhevojskovye_voprosy/kriticheskaja _infrastruktura_kak_obekt_obespechenija_nacionalnoj_bezopasnosti_ssha_2022/ 146-1-0-3209 [Accessed: 23. November 2023]. (In the original: Berlovskij, V. i Aleksandrov, B. 2022. Kritičeskaâ infrastruktura kak ob"ekt obespečeniâ nacional'noj bezopasnosti SŠA. Pentagonus [onlajn]. Dostupno na: http://pentagonus.ru/publ/po_rodam_vojsk/obshhevojskovye_voprosy/kriticheskaja _infrastruktura_kak_obekt_obespechenija_nacionalnoj_bezopasnosti_ssha_2022/ 146-1-0-3209 [Data obraŝeniâ: 23 noâbrâ 2023 g];
2. Bojanić, D. 2022. The theoretical and methodological analysis of challenges, risks and threats in modern theory of national security. Vojno delo, 74(2), pp.1-17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo2202001B;
3. Božanić, D., Pamučar, D. & Bojanić, D. 2015 Modifcation of the analytic hierarchy process AHP method using fuzzy logic: Fuzzy AHP approach as a support to the decision making process concerning engagement of the group for additional hindering. Serbian Journal of Management, 10(2), pp.151-171. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm10-7223;
4. Castells, M. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. Wiley Online Library. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514;
5. Deng, X. & Jiang, W. 2019. D number theory based game-theoretic framework in adversarial decision making under a fuzzy environment. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 106 pp.194-213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.01.007;