Influence of radicality surgical excision on results in the treatment of Basocellular Skin Carcinoma (BCC)

Author:

Lukić D.,Lazić P.,Bandić J.,Tačević Z.,Babić N.,Ivić D.

Abstract

With the prospective study, from June 2003 to January 2013, were compared the results of treatment of basocellular carcinomas (BCC) of the skin in 210 respondents. The respondents were divided into 3 groups. The first group, group A (61 respondents) consisted of respondents treated for BCC with surgical excision, with distance incision of 1 cm from the tumor. In the second group, group B (79 respondents) were classified respondents treated for BCC with surgical excision, at distance incision 2 cm from the tumor, while the third group, group C (70 respondents) was classified by respondents treated with surgical excision of BCC, at distance incision approximately 3cm from the tumor. The parameters for comparison of treatment results were: the method (radicality) of treatment, number of the relapse, elapsed time from surgery to relapse and subsequent disfiguration. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal radicality in the treatment of BCC, i.e., the number of relapses in relation to the radicalism of the BCC excisions. In most of the respondents, intraoperative skin defect was closed by direct suture. Spare distance, from the edge of the BCC, which amounts to 1 cm in group A, results in significantly lower percentage of disfigurement. At the same time, in group A was recorded the highest number of recurrences of BCC. Radical surgeries of BCC, which were performed with the resection margin of 3 cm from the BCC, resulted in the lowest number of relapses, but statistically significant percentage of postoperative disfigurement. The most optimal excisional distance from the edge of the BCC is about 2 cm. Due to the significantly smaller number of disfigurement, resections distance of 2 cm from the BCC and direct suture of postoperative defect take precedence, regardless of the localization of the tumor.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference15 articles.

1. Rogers H.W., Weinstock M.A., Harris A.R Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, (2006) Arch Dermatol,2010; 283:287;

2. Oprić M., Babić M., Granić V. Tumori mekih tkiva i kože, Elit Medica, Beograd, 1999;

3. Lukić D. Tumori kože, Medicinski fakultet Banja Luka, 2010;45-48;

4. Lukić D., Bandić J., Ivić D. Rezultati lečenja planocelularnog i bazocelularnog kercinoma kože glave i vrata i drugih anatomskih regija, Medicinska istraživanja, 2006;40(1): 29-35;

5. Anwar U., Ghazal A.S.K., Ahmad M., Sharpe D.T. Horrifying basal cell carcinoma forearm lesion leading to shoulder disarticulation. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006; 117-9;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3