Procedural legitimation of private parties before the Court of Justice of the EU in the light of Carvalho case-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Procedural legitimation of private parties before the Court of Justice of the EU in the light of Carvalho case

Published:2023 Issue:3-4 Volume: Page:239-247
ISSN:2217-9739
Container-title:International Review
language:en
Short-container-title:International Review

Author:

Vlajnić Jelena,Spasojević Đorđe

Abstract

The paper discusses the position of private individuals as applicants before the Court of Justice of the EU, particularly in the context of cases related to regulating the consequences of climate change and environmental protection. Individuals wishing to challenge measures of European Union institutions related to climate change face, for now, an insurmountable obstacle in proving the existence of an individual concern as a condition for filing an action. After analyzing the positive legal regulation of procedural legitimacy for private individuals and briefly considering cases before the Court of Justice of the EU related to the regulation of the consequences of climate change, the paper outlines how the Court interprets the existence of an individual concern as a condition for filing an action.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Link

https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2217-9739/2023/2217-97392303239V.pdf

Reference17 articles.

1. Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union; available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT:en:PDF;

2. For updates on the actions for annulment after the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty, see. Čavoški, A. (2009). Pravosudni sistem evropske unije u svetlu reformskog ugovora, Strani pravni život, Vol. 1, pp.73-85;

3. Mladenov, M., Prelević Plavšić S., Staparski T. (2022). Climate change from the perspective of the European Court of Human Rights, International Review, Vol.11, No.3-4, pp.118-122;

4. Winter, G. (2009). Armando Carvalho and Others v. EU: Invoking Human Rights and the Paris Agreement for Better Climate Protection Legislation, Cambridge University Press online, p.139;

5. Spasojević, Đ., Vlajnić, J. (2021). Normative Aspect of Polygraph Examination in Criminal Procedure and its Application Outside Criminal Procedure with Reference to Polygraph Examination of Candidates for Employment and Employees, Employment, education and entrepreneurship, pp.181-187;