A modern age dialogue between orthodox theology and science

Author:

Kostić Slaviša

Abstract

The paper deals with the relationship of Orthodox theology and science throughout history and also considers contemporary dialogue of Orthodox theology and science. The foundational principle laid in the thought of Cappadocian Fathers emphasizes theosis as communion of man with God. The next segment deals with the paradox in the search of high knowledge: the highest thing we are looking for is beyond our knowledge, which is the exact reason why Basil of Caesarea has approved of human reasoning and development of human intellect. There is also an important theologian, Gregory Palamas, who has indicated that we cannot come to knowledge of God through secular science but through faith, contemplation and practices of asceticism, from which we are receiving true knowledge. His views are close to the axiom of Gregory the Theologian: Faith is what gives fullness to our reasoning. Then, a contemporary dialogue between Orthodox theology and science is also considered through the lenses of these theologians: Alexei Nesteruk, who represents the phenomenological approach to the relation of Orthodox theology and science; Stoyan Tanev, George Dion Dragas and Kyriacos Markides who represent reconsideration of the relationship between Orthodox theology and science through an anthropic principle; and Christopher Knight who pleads for theological naturalism. We conclude that phenomenological approach of Alexei Nesteruk - who has believed that interference between science and theology is possible by utilization of transcendence and asymmetry between theology and science for better understanding of existential condition of the human person - is close to the patristic view of theology and science.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Reference32 articles.

1. Barbour, I. (1968) Issues in Science and religion. Prentice Hall;

2. Cook, C. (2012) The Philokalia and the Inner Life: On Passions and Prayer. Wipf and Stock Publishers, USA Eugene. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1cgf4m9;

3. Costache, D. (2019) The Orthodox Doctrine of Creation in the age of Science. Journal of Orthodox Christian Studies, Volume 2, Number 1, 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1353/ joc.2019.0003;

4. Dragas, G. (2011) Theology and Science: An Anthropic principle. https://www.scribd.com/ document/164510541/Dragas-Theology-and-Science-The-Anthropic-Principle. (posećeno 16. 09. 2019);

5. Graiver, I. (2018) Asceticism of the Mind. Forms of Attention and Self-Transformation in Late Antique Monasticism, Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3