Considerations regarding a new settlement typology in Serbia

Author:

Pantić MarijanaORCID

Abstract

A division between urban and rural settlements/areas has been traditionally applied in statistical reporting worldwide. The reports applying these terms have been used to create and implement development policies and measures. However, international policies such as those featured by the European Union (EU), as well as national policies, also recognize, define and render transitional types of settlements. The Program of Implementation of the Spatial Plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) called for a new definition of the term "settlement" determined by new criteria for a settlement typology by the end of 2015. Except for theoretical contributions, this task has not been completed yet. At the same time, a trichotomous settlement typology has been recommended to Serbia by the EU as a result of the accession process. Therefore, this paper aims to analyze and discuss a new settlement categorization, taking into account considerations on the number of categories, number of variables, choice of variables and territorial level for data collection. These aspects are empirically tested on a data set collected through the Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) in Serbia. The data are analyzed using two approaches: descriptive and cluster analysis. A parallel with other countries and theoretical recommendations is drawn in the discussion, based on which some recommendations are presented.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference64 articles.

1. Albrecht, W. (2006). Experiences with Grids at Eurostat, Nordic Forum for Geostatistics, Kongsvinger, Norway.;

2. Baiocchi, G., Creutzig, F., Minx, J., Pichler, P.P. (2015). A spatial typology of human settlements and their CO 2 emissions in England, Global Environmental Change 34, pp. 13-21.;

3. Bengs, C. & Schmidt-Thomé, K. (2006): Urban-rural relations in Europe, ESPON 1.1.2 - Final Report. Helsinki: Centre for Urban and Regional Studies. Helsinki University of Technology.;

4. Beyazli, D., Aydemir, S., Öksüz, A.M., Özlü, S. (2017). Rural typology with and inductive approach, Int J Environ Res 11, pp. 225-241.;

5. Bogdanov, N., Meredith, D., Efstratoglou, S. (2008). A Typology of Rural Areas in Serbia, Economic Annals 177, pp. 7-29.;

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Digital Participation Framework for Mountain Areas in Serbia;Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences;2023-02-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3