Abstract
The right to identity of the child, internationally recognized by the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, is one of the most important in the corpus of child rights. Its structure is complex since it includes several narrower rights. Nevertheless, the situations where it comes to restriction of the right to identity are not negligible. One of them is the right to anonymous birth, the possibility acknowledged by legislators in a certain number of European countries. Conflicting interests between a mother and a child are inevitable consequence of the anonymous birth. The aim of this article is to compare the right to identity of a child and the mother's right to anonymous birth as insurmountable barrier in determining biological origin. Special attention is paid to the possibility of establishing an adequate balance between their interests, by comparing the importance that national legal system offers to each of them, with appropriate arguments, several different models of motherhood regulations are presented and can be found in European legislations. The analysis also includes the stances of international bodies, especially the European Court of Human Rights.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference34 articles.
1. Blauwhoff, R., 2008, Tracing down the historical development of the legal concept of the right to know one's origins: Has 'to know or not to know' ever been the legal question?, Utrecht Law Review, Igitur, Vol. 4, No. 2;
2. Colcelli, V., 2012, Anonymous Birth, Birth Registration and the Child's Right to Know Their Origins in the Italian Legal System: A Short Comment, Civil & Legal Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 2;
3. Dally, A., 1982, Inventing Motherhood: The Consequences of and Ideal, London, Burnett Books;
4. D'alton-Harrison, R., 2014, Mater semper incertus est: Who's Your Mummy?, Medical Law Review, Vol. 22, No. 3;
5. Draškić, M., 2007, Porodično pravo i prava deteta, Beograd, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu;