The effects of modern technology on legal certainty in tax law: The new frontier

Author:

Kostić Svetislav,Jerinić JelenaORCID

Abstract

The speedy reforms of Serbia's tax legislation, often introduced on the basis of comparative sources, has created a significant body of dormant legislation, due to the lack of knowledge and experience to implement them. The article explores some aspects of legitimacy of Serbian tax legislation, namely the consequences of the misalignment of tax law provisions with taxpayers behavior, using the example of unregistered freelancer taxation. The authors address fundamental legal certainty issues arising from the clash between changes brought on by innovation and imposition of static tax legislation to circumstances unimaginable at the time the legislation was enacted. Analysis has shown that Serbian legislation and caselaw do not provide an effective remedy for these cases, since the principle of legitimate expectations, as developed elsewhere in Europe, is still distant. The authors propose a specific institutional mechanism for overcoming uncertainty in similar situations.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference44 articles.

1. Adžić, S., Adžić, J., 2009, The Public Healthcare System in the Transition Countries: The Case Study of Serbia, Interdisciplinary Management Research, 5, pp. 515-540;

2. Avi-Yonah, R., Haiyan, X., 2017, Evaluating BEPS, Erasmus Law Review, 1, pp. 3-11;

3. Baez Moreno, A., Brauner, Y., 2018, Policy Options Regarding Tax Challenges of the Digitalized Economy: Making a Case for Withholding Taxes (https://ssrn. com/abstract=3167124, 18. 11. 2023);

4. Barak-Erez, D., 2008, The Institutional Aspects of Comparative Law, Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 477-493;

5. Berge, G., Widdershoven, R., 1998, The Principle of Legitimate Expectations in Dutch Constitutional and Administrative Law, The Hague, Intersentia;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3