Are the human rights providing empowerment possibilities for social work with vulnerable groups in Republic of Srpska?

Author:

Šućur-Janjetović Vesna,Rakanović-Radonjić Andrea,Gajić Draško

Abstract

Vulnerable groups represent special categories that are in a higher risk of being socially excluded, vulnerable and sensitive to spectrum of risks, including poverty. Disabled persons, children, youngsters, women, elders, victims/survivors of violence, illiterate people, people living in rural areas, members of certain minority groups, refugees and displaced persons, members of LGBTIQ+ communities etc, are considered to be vulnerable. Human rights as a universal concept are guaranteed by the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), which guarantees the implementation of human rights for all citizens of BiH. The obligation to implement the international documents that secure the standards, obliging the state to enforce guaranteed human rights is also anticipated by the Constitution. Human rights are the foundation and the framework for social work and social policy when it comes to working with and in favour of vulnerable groups, however, in reality of social work practice, these groups remain on the margins of society. This article focuses on possibilities of social work in helping vulnerable groups to move from the margins of society. The article represents the results of the analysis conducted on gathered relevant documents that include information regarding the current state and processes, status and changes regarding the vulnerable groups' human rights enforcement in Republic of Srpska. The theoretical framework used for understanding and trying to search for possible answers to the defined question is underpinned by the critical social work perspectives. The content analysis was used as an independent theoretical-empirical method when research on relevant documents was conducted.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. Baines, Donna. 2007. "Anti-oppressive social work practice: Fighting for space, fighting for change". In Doing anti-oppressive practice: Building transformative politicized social work, ed. D. Baines. Halifax, NS: Fernwood Publishing;

2. Baines, Donna. 2017. Doing Anti-Oppressive Practice: Social Justice Social Work. Blackpoint, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing;

3. Bodrožić, Đuro. 2023. "Uloga države u oblikovanju i zaštiti nacionlnog identiteta." Srpska politička misao, 80 (2): 97-113. DOI: 10.5937/spm80-44375;

4. Chenoweth, Lesley. McAuliffe, Donna A. 2011. The road to social work and human service practice 3rd ed. London: Cengage Learning;

5. Creswell, John Ward. 2002. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3