The presence of circular (bio)economy in the environmental investment projects of the Western Balkan countries
-
Published:2023
Issue:3-4
Volume:51
Page:103-123
-
ISSN:0350-0373
-
Container-title:Industrija
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Industrija
Author:
Molnar DejanORCID, Josipović SonjaORCID, Rikalović Milena
Abstract
The uncontrolled use of natural resources, loss of biodiversity and natural capital, pollution of water resources, CO2 emissions, inadequate waste disposal and other environmental problems have influenced the growth of investments in green technologies, as well as the development of more efficient methods in terms of the use of resources to increase productivity in different sectors of the economy without endangering the land and biodiversity. The paper examines the advantages of developing the investment projects that promote the concepts of bioeconomy and circular economy and ensure profitability without a negative impact on the natural environment. The innovation projects supported by the Western Balkans Investment Framework in the field of energy, environment, transport, social protection and digital infrastructure are analyzed. It is concluded that about 50% of the supported projects are environmental projects that aim at providing environmental benefits or preventing the environmental damage. Special attention is paid to the environmental projects co-financed by the Innovation Fund of the Republic of Serbia.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference34 articles.
1. Alberini, A., & Cooper, J. (2000). Applications of the contingent valuation method in developing countries: A survey (Vol. 146). Food & Agriculture Org.anization; 2. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal register, 58(10), 4601-4614. Retrived from https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/ mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf; 3. Bateman, I., Carson R. T., Day, B., Hanemann, M., Hanley, N., Hett, T., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Mourato, S., Ozdemiroglu, E., Pearce, D. W., Sugden, R. & Swanson, J. (2002). Economic Valuation with Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual. Cheltenham, Edward Elga; 4. Bishop, R. C., & Heberlein, T. A. (1979). Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American journal of agricultural economics, 61(5), 926-930. doi: 10.2307/3180348; 5. Boyle, K. J. (2003). Contingent Valuation in Practice. In P. A. Champ, K. J. Boyle, & T. C. Brown (Eds.), A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (pp. 111-169). Springer;
|
|