Author:
Ardakani Mostafa,Bonds Timothy
Abstract
This research employs a series of machine learning methods to predict the direction of lane change. The response is a binary variable indicating changing the lane to the left or to the right. The employed methods include Decision Tree, Discriminant Analysis, Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbor and Ensemble. The results are compared to the conventional logistic regression method. Both performance criteria and computational times are reported for comparison purposes. A design of experiments is run to test 25 classification methods at ratios of 25%, 50%, and 75% right to left lane change data. Moreover, samples are validated by cross and holdback validation methods. RUS Boosted trees, an ensemble method, shows improvement over logistic regression. This research provides valuable insights on lane change behaviour, including trajectories and driving styles, which falls into the field of microscopic lane change study.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Mechanical Engineering,General Engineering,Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality,Transportation,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference21 articles.
1. Ardakani, M. K., and J. Yang. (2016). Generalized Gipps-type vehicle-following models. Journal of Transportation Engineering Part A, 143 (3): 04016011.https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000022;
2. Wang, Y. (2017). Modeling and Simulation of Aggressive Lane-Changing Behavior for Highway Driver Training. 2017 3rd IEEE Internaitonal Conference on Computer and Communications (pp. 2894-2898). Chengdu: IEEE;
3. Ardakani, M. K., Yang, j., and Sun, L., (2017). Stimulus response driving behavior: An improved general motor vehicle-following model, Advances in Transportation Studies, no. 39, pp. 23-36;
4. Gu, X., Yu, J., Han, Y., Han, M., & Wei, L. (2019). Vehicle Lane Chnage Decision Model Based on Random Forest. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems (ICPICS), (pp. 115-120). Shenyang, China;
5. Toledo, T. a. (2009). State Dependence in Lane-Changing Models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transporation Research Board, 2124(1), 81-88;