Author:
Tselepis Thea,Nieuwenhuizen Cecile,Schachtebeck Chris
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to propose a matrix that could guide the approaches to entrepreneurship education at tertiary level bearing in mind binary constructs such as theory-led learning versus practice-led learning, as well as different contexts such as entrepreneurship in a formal programme versus entrepreneurship in a module only. A qualitative research approach was followed to compile the matrix, using data collected from 25 students who reflected on what an ideal programme or module could have entailed and what the most meaningful activities could be for such a programme or module. The matrix proposes some insightful approaches and activities that educators may consider when refining their module outcomes and assessments.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry
Reference33 articles.
1. Babbie, E. & Mouton, J. (2014). The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press;
2. Ball, S. J. (2013). The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press;
3. Becherd, J. P. & Toulouse, J. M. (1998). Validation of a didactic model for the analysis of training objectives in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 13 (4), 317-332;
4. Boyle, C. (2015). Take (s) One to Know One: Photography and Practice-led Research. International Journal of the Image, 6 (1), 13-21;
5. Brown, C. (2000). Entrepreneurial Education Teaching Guide. Kansas: Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership Clearing house on Entrepreneurship Education;
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献