Doprinos primene direktne u odnosu na indirektnu hands-on instrukciju na postignuća učenika u početnom obrazovanju u prirodnim naukama

Author:

Cvjetićanin StankoORCID,Maričić MirjanaORCID

Abstract

Ensuring the optimal (adequate) level of instructional guidance in teaching natural sciences in primary education is of utmost importance for the proper acquisition and application of knowledge. The goal of this paper is to examine the contribution of direct hands-on instruction relative to an indirect one on student achievement regarding the movement and properties of materials in classes of integrated natural sciences (classes of the World around Us and Science and Social Studies). The research tasks include a comparative analysis of the quality of students' knowledge acquired with the application of direct in relation to indirect hands-on instruction, as well as the analysis of the permanence of that knowledge. The following methods were used in the research: theoretical analysis method, descriptive-analytical method, and experimental method. The research technique is testing, and the instrument is knowledge tests (pre-test, post-test, and re-test). The research sample consisted of 94 students of the third grade of primary school, divided into two groups: E1 (application of indirect hands-on instruction) and E2 group (application of direct hands-on instruction). The results of the research indicate that the students of the E1 group achieved somewhat better and more lasting knowledge about the movement and properties of materials in relation to the students of the E2 group. However, a significant difference between their achievements was observed only at the cognitive level evaluated in the post-test. This leads to the conclusion that both types of hands-on instructions should be applied in the third grade when teaching the content related to the movement and properties of materials. In addition, greater preference should be given to indirect over direct hands-on instruction because it not only provides an opportunity for students to have better achievement, but also it enables a greater degree of independent research and experimental work.

Funder

Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry

Reference40 articles.

1. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J. & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103 (1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1037/a0021017;

2. Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R. & Bloom, B. S. (2001). A taxonomy for learning teaching and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman Publishing;

3. Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2001). Epistemologically authentic scientific reasoning. In: Crowley, K., Schunn, C. D. & Okada, T. (Eds.). Designing for science: Implications from everyday, classroom, and professional settings (351-392). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum;

4. Cohen, M. T. (2008). The Effect of Direct Instruction versus Discovery Learning on the Understanding of Science Lessons by Second Grade Students. Retrieved May 5, 2021. from www: https://opencommons.uconn. edu/nera_2008/30;

5. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. R. (2018). Research methods in education. London: Routledge;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3