Phases of construction and difficulties of developing knowledge tests in educational practice

Author:

Jeremić Ivana

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an empirical research which determined the stages of construction of knowledge tests in educational practice, the difficulties faced by teachers in the process of test development, as well as the ways of overcoming these difficulties. The descriptive-analytical re-search method, content analysis and survey techniques were used in the research. The research sample included 362 subject teachers employed in primary schools in Serbia. All respondents included in the research indicated the difficulties they face in the process of making tests, i.e., the ways of solving these difficulties. A sub-sample of a total of 80 teachers consisted of Serbian language and mathematics teachers who reported on the phases of the knowledge test construction in their practice. The results of the research indicate that teachers perceive only a small number of theoretically defined stages in the construction of knowledge tests. Certain differences were identified in explaining the phases among the teachers of Serbian language and teachers of mathematics. At the same time, two-thirds of the surveyed teachers face difficulties when they prepare knowledge tests independently. The existing difficulties are usually solved by consulting the more experienced colleagues or by searching for a solution independently. The author's recommendation is to enable teachers by means of an additional teacher training courses, to acquire the appropriate knowledge and skills that would help them create the knowledge tests with satisfactory methodological characteristics, and at the same time adequate for the needs of their teaching practice.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Subject

Materials Chemistry,Economics and Econometrics,Media Technology,Forestry

Reference19 articles.

1. Crocker L. and Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston;

2. Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials od Educational Measurement. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc;

3. Fajgelj, S. (2004). Metode istraživanja ponašanja. Beograd: Centar za primenjenu psihologiju;

4. Frey, B. B. et al. (2005). Item-writing rules: collective wisdom. Teaching and Teacher Education. 21 (4), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.008;

5. Hamafyelto, R. S., Abubakar, H. T. and Hamafyelto, S. S. (2015). Assessing Teacher Competence in Test Construction and Content Validity of Teacher Made Examination Questions in Commerce in Borno State, Nigeria. Education. 5 (5), 123-128;

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3