Abstract
Pandemic-induced economic shocks saw the European Commission and national competition authorities adopt so-called comfort letters to provide guidance, assurance, and legal certainty to undertakings in order to help mitigate the detrimental effects of the crisis. Whereas it is true that desperate times may call for desperate measures, the fact that the Commission continues to issue comfort letters for initiatives with little relevance to the ongoing emergency raises questions. This article analyzes the re-emergence of comfort letters from the viewpoints of legal basis and certainty. It finds that the foundations upon which the letters are constructed are shaky, which translates into the fostering of uncertainty. In that regard, explored are alternatives for Union enforcers to deploy a robust bespoke guidance regime for the future.
Subject
Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference60 articles.
1. Arhel, P. (2021) 'Activité de l'Autorité de la concurrence en 2020' (Actu Juridique, 23 July 2021) accessed 20 May 2022.
2. Bethell, O., Baird, G., & Waksman, A. (2020) 'Ensuring innovation through participative antitrust' 8 Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 30.
3. Brown, A. (1992) 'Notification of agreements to the EC Commission: whether to submit to a flawed system' 17(4) European Law Review 323.
4. Cortese, B. (2014) 'The Difficult Relationship between Administrative Authorities and the Judiciary in Antitrust Private Enforcement' in Cortese (ed), EU competition law: between public and private enforcement (Kluwer).
5. Costa-Cabral, F. (2020) 'Future Mapping the Three Dimensions of EU Competition Law: Legislative Proposals and COVID-19 Framework' 7(2) Journal of International and Comparative Law 307.