Affiliation:
1. State Institution “Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University”, Ukraine
Abstract
The aim of the article is to highlight certain aspects of attitude formation in the educational environment to the issue of borrowing in visual art works and in project and design activities. Results. Borrowing, considered as the transformation of something into one’s own property, can take different forms, with appropriation as borrowing someone else’s work (part of it) to express new content and visual plagiarism as an ethical violation, presenting someone else’s visual work (part of it) under one’s own name, including. The analysis of research related to borrowing in visual art works gave grounds to single out the socio-cultural, pedagogical, psychological, moral and ethical, legal, and technological aspects of attitude formation to the issue of borrowing in visual art works and in project and design activities. The range of attitudes towards borrowings in works of art is determined, ranging from acceptance to denial of the existence of original works, and can be perceived under different conditions as a neutral, positive, and negative phenomenon. The article proposes recommendations for preventing visual plagiarism in creative student projects, which can be applied by teachers in educational and methodological activities. The scientific novelty lies in identifying and analysing the socio-cultural, pedagogical, psychological, moral and ethical, legal, and technological aspects of attitude formation in the educational environment to the issue of borrowing in visual art works. Conclusions. Considering the identified aspects of attitude formation in the educational environment to the issue of borrowing in visual art works is crucial for developing a well-balanced strategy of behaviour by teachers and improving the methodology of teaching the educational components of artistic and design educational programmes regarding the formation of a culture of academic integrity and prevention of visual plagiarism in the development of visual works. The issue of responding to manifestations of visual plagiarism in the educational environment, the development of a set of methodological measures to promote a zero-tolerance stance towards plagiarism, and the conscious and constant adherence to professional ethics in the field of visual art require additional study and detailed analysis taking into account existing practices.
Publisher
Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts
Reference21 articles.
1. Assali, I., & Attiya, A. (2021). Preventing Visual Plagiarism in Design Programs in Higher Education Institutions: The Case of Ahlia University. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 9(5), 102–106. http://www.doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.E5172.019521 [in English].
2. Baudrillard, J. (2014). Screened Out (C. Turner, Trans.). Verso [in English].
3. Appropriative art, borrowing, and copyright;Bereznytskyi;Contemporary Art,2005
4. Borysova, S. V. (2021). Poshuk dzherel natkhnennia pry proiektuvanni obiektiv art-dyzainu [Search for sources of inspiration during the design of art design objects]. In Dyzain pislia epokhy postmodernu: Idei, teoriii, praktyka [Design after the postmodern era: Ideas, theories, practice] [Proceedings of the Conference] (pp. 190–193). Kyiv National University of Culture and Arts [in Ukrainian].
5. Chyzh Zhun, H. (2017). Vplyv yevropeiskykh ta amerykanskykh khudozhnykiv na rozvytok kytaiskoho zhinochoho portretu u 1970–80-kh rr. (zahalni tendentsii ta priami zapozychennia) [The influence of European and American artists on the development of Chinese female portraiture in the 1970s and 1980s (general trends and direct borrowings)]. In Aktualni pytannia mystetstvoznavstva: vyklyky XXI stolittia [Current issues of art history: Challenges of the XXI century] [Proceedings of the Conference] (pp. 153–156). Kharkiv State Academy of Design and Arts [in Ukrainian].