Affiliation:
1. Cardiology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract
Objective. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of adverse events after ascending aortic replacement for the aortic aneurysms in the early postoperative period.Material and Methods. The analysis included 151 patients with ascending aortic aneurysm who underwent non-hemiarch or hemiarch repair. The following adverse outcomes were selected: postoperative delirium, respiratory failure, bleeding, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and in-hospital mortality. Predictors of adverse clinical events were identified by constructing uni- and multivariate logistic regression.Results. Significant predictors of early outcomes and mortality after ascending aortic replacement were as follows: female gender, atrial fibrillation, low glomerular filtration rate, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, aortic root repair, multiple organ dysfunction, duration of cardiac arrest, operation time, and reoperation for bleeding.Conclusions. The risk factors of adverse outcomes after ascending aortic replacement were decreased kidney function, atrial fibrillation, female gender, aortic root repair, and increased duration of cardiac arrest and operation time.
Publisher
Cardiology Research Institute
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging,Medicine (miscellaneous),Internal Medicine
Reference20 articles.
1. Yan T.D., Bannon P.G., Bavaria J., Coselli J.S., Elefteriades J.A., Griepp R.B. et al. Consensus on hypothermia in aortic arch surgery. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2013;2(2):163–168. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.03.03.
2. Davies R.A., Black D., Jeremy R.W., Bannon P.G., Bayfield M.S., Hendel P.N. et al. Evolution in the techniques and outcomes of aortic arch surgery: А 22 year single centre experience. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20(11):704–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.07.009.
3. Williams J.B., Peterson E.D., Zhao Y., O‘Brien S.M., Andersen N.D., Miller D.C. et al. Contemporary results for proximal aortic replacement in North America. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2012;60(13):1156–1162. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.023.
4. Kozlov B.N., Panfilov D.S., Sonduev E.L., Lukinov V.L. Ascending aortic aneurysm: Propensity score matching analysis of hemiarch and non-hemiarch replacement. Russian Journal of Cardiology. 2020;25(10):3887. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15829/1560-4071-2020-3887.
5. Indja B., Fanning J.P., Maller J.J., Fraser J.F., Bannon P.G., Vallely M. et al. Neural network imaging to characterize brain injury in cardiac procedures: The emerging utility of connectomics. Br. J. Anaesth. 2017;118(5):680–688. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex088.