Analysis of electrotherapy in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death according to remote monitoring data

Abstract

Aim: To determine the factors associated with development of justified and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) activations in patients at high risk of sudden cardiac death based on the remote monitoring systemMaterial and Methods. We analyzed remote monitoring data from 2014 to 2022 in 132 patients with ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Patients were divided into 2 groups 1 – patients with persistent paroxysmal tachyarrhythmias; 2 – patients without persistent paroxysms of ventricular tachycardia (VT) / ventricular fibrillation (VF). In case of inappropriate shocks, the causes and possible predictors of their development were analyzed.Results. Of 132 patients, 62 (46.9%) patients appeared to have persistent VT/VF. It was found that the probability of detecting persistent paroxysms of VT/VF decreased with a history of revascularization (p = 0.030) and increased in the absence of amiodarone therapy (p = 0.012), with increasing age (p = 0.035), with decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35% (p = 0.016). 71 arrhythmic episodes (17.9%) in 27 (20.4%) patients were considered as false detection of tachyarrhythmias. Analyzing the causes of inappropriate electrotherapy, different types of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in the zone of VT detection (85.9%), including atrial fibrillation (25.4%), in smaller percentage of cases there was discovered T-wave detection 4.2%, noise on the electrode – 2.8%, 7.1% – double counter due to the operation of the cardiac contractility modulation device. When analyzing factors associated with the development of false detection, reliable results were obtained with regard to the presence of a history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.036), implanted single-chamber ICD (p = 0.028).Conclusion. The development of persistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias was noted in 47% of patients with ICD as a part of primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, and 20.4% had the development of inappropriate detection and electrotherapy. Predictors of their occurrence have been identified, which can be used as development of strategies for shock minimization.