Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is the analysis of the notion "judicial disobedience”. The author describes two aspects (individual and institutional) and compare them with civil disobedience. The problem is presented in a paradigmatic manner upon the example of case law of American courts relating to slavery in the period of half of the century preceding the outbreak of the Civil War. Based on this, the author constructs a typology assuming four possible opinions of an adjudicating judge based on provisions of law, which are contrary to the judge’s conscience and morality. In this paper the problem is described upon the example of Justice Lemuel Shaw, Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court from 1830 to 1860. However special attention is paid to his judgment in case Commonwealth v. Aves., but his another verdicts have been mentioned as well.
Publisher
Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR
Subject
Law,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference39 articles.
1. Adlow, E. (1962). The Genius of Lemuel Shaw. Boston: Massachusetts Bar Association.
2. Allen, T.R.S. (2013). The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution, and Common Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Brand-Ballard, J. (2010). Limits of Legality: The Ethics of Lawless Judging. Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Burbank, S.B. (1997). The Courtroom as Classroom: Independence, Imagination and Ideology in the Work of Jack Weinstein. Columbia Law Review, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 1971–2009.
5. Burbank, S.B. (1997). The Architecture of Judicial Independence. Southern California Law Review, vol. 72, pp. 315–371.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Judicial resistance and the virtues;Oñati Socio-Legal Series;2024-02-26