Uniformed Services Pension Amendment Acts in Poland as Part of State Politics of Memory

Author:

Grabarczyk Mateusz1

Affiliation:

1. Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań

Abstract

The article is an analysis of the regulations regarding the reduction of pensions of former officers of the People's Republic of Poland’s security services as an element of state politics of memory, presenting the Uniformed Services Pension Amendment Acts of 2009 and 2016 from the perspective of transitional justice. Whilst investigating the admissibility of using such a retribution mechanism, the author draws attention to the purpose of this type of regulation. Reducing pensions has, in fact, two goals – a retrospective one and a prospective one. The retrospective goal is about administering historical justice by penalizing a specific group of people using various mechanisms (in this case administrative sanctions). In the prospective aspect, it is an element of institutionalizing memory and building a specific political narrative. As a consequence, apart from commemorative practices, it aims to produce and disseminate knowledge in public space, while clearly rejecting the past regime. In relation to the Uniformed Services Pension Amendment Acts, while the Act of 2009 was to some extent aimed at the retrospective goal, the 2016 Act is primarily an element of politics of memory used by authorities to control the recollection of past events by explicitly condemning the previous system and all persons in any way related to it. For this reason, the author focuses on the mechanism of reducing pensions as one of the elements of politics of memory in Poland.

Publisher

Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR

Reference36 articles.

1. Banaszkiewicz, B. (2003). Rozrachunek z przeszłością komunistyczną w polskim ustawodawstwie i orzecznictwie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego. Ius et Lex 1, 441–486.

2. Bäcker, R. (2004). PRL między totalitaryzmem a autorytaryzmem. In A. Kasińska-Metryka (Ed.), Polska w dobie przemian. Kielce: Wydawnictwo Akademii Świętokrzyskiej.

3. Bevir, M. (1994). Objectivity in History. History and Theory 3, 328–344.

4. Blake, Ch. (1955). Can History Be Objective? Mind 64, 61–78.

5. Czarnota, A. (2007). The Politics of the Lustration Law in Poland, 1989-2006. In A. Mayer-Rieckh, P. de Greiff (Eds.), Justice as Prevention. Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies. New York: Social Science Research Council, 222-258.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3