Affiliation:
1. Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin
2. Supreme Administrative Court
Abstract
The aim of the article is to analyse the possibility and necessity of empowering animals as ‘non-personal’ legal subjects under Polish law, indicating the relevant case law (of ordinary and, mainly, administrative courts). The research assumption is the statement that, although administrative case law contains elements of a fairly progressive approach that results in an interpretation of the applicable provisions on the protection and (rudimentarily regulated) animal rights, the existing provisions are far from sufficient and leave quite a lot of room for a very flexible interpretation. That may lead not solely to an animal-friendly interpretation, but also to abuses against them. Therefore, postulated amendments concerning constitutional protection of animal rights deserve attention, as they would be important for the systemic interpretation of law. The research subject is both philosophical and legal literature, as well as case law. The main method is the logico-linguistic analysis (with some elements of historical and comparative approach) of texts on philosophy, including legal philosophy and ethics, as well as the analysis of case law. The research findings have a mixed, descriptive-and-normative character, while the above combination of ethics, legal theory, and legal practice both manifests the evolution of the approach to the titular matter and makes an original contribution to jurisprudence as a scientific discipline.
Publisher
Stowarzyszenie Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Spolecznej - Sekcja Polska IVR
Reference20 articles.
1. Bentham, J. (1958). Wprowadzenie do zasad moralności i prawodawstwa, tłum B. Nawroczyński. Warszawa: PWN.
2. Białocerkiewicz, J. (2005). Status prawny zwierząt. Prawa zwierząt czy prawna ochrona zwierząt. Toruń: Wydawnictwo TNOiK.
3. Bieluk, J. (2020). Rzeka jako osoba prawna. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 2(29), 11-23.
4. Chmielarz-Grochal, A., Sułkowski, J. (2021). O potrzebie świadomej konstytucjonalizacji statusu zwierząt. Państwo i Prawo 9, 3-23.
5. Daniłowicz, W. (2020). Teoria etyczna J. Benthama a dereifikacja i prawa zwierząt. Studia Prawnicze 1(221), 7–27.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Becoming Symbolic: Some Remarks on the Judicial Rewriting of the Offence of Animal Abuse in Poland;International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique;2024-09-11