Return to the “Foundations” of Quentin Skinner

Author:

Kadyrov Daud

Abstract

This article provides a brief analysis of the compilation “Rethinking the Foundations of Modern Political Thought”, which under the editorship of Annabel Brett and James Tully, represents an attempt to reconsider the original work of Quentin Skinner “The Foundations of Modern Political Thought”. The authors of the compilation examine such fundamental topics as the context of Q. Skinner’s “Foundations’, his “linguistic” philosophy, rhetoric, late scholastics; upon the questions on Hobbs and democracy. In conclusion, analysis is conducted on this attempt to “reconsider” the ideas and views of Skinner, as well as his response to the remarks. The goal of this article consists in examination of the main theses and criticism of the authors of the compilation. The need for such review is substantiated by the fact that the Cambridge School of Intellectual History gains more relevance for the Russian humanities. For the Russian political science, “Rethinking of the Foundations” remains an important and untranslated source for broader understanding of the Cambridge School of Intellectual History. The author of the article attempts to partially fulfill this gap.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference27 articles.

1. Atnashev, T. Velizhev, M. Kembridzhskaya shkola: teoriya i praktika intellektual'noi istorii / Sost. T. Atnashev, M. Velizhev. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2018. 632 s.

2. Atnashev, T. Velizhev, M. Kembridzhskaya shkola: istoriya i metod // Kembridzhskaya shkola: teoriya i praktika intellektual'noi istorii / Sost. T. Atnashev, M. Velizhev. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2018. C. 7-52.

3. Atnashev, T., Velizhev, M. «Context is king»: Dzhon Pokok — istorik politicheskikh yazykov // M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. № 134 (4). 2015. S. 21–41.

4. Kadyrov D.E. Metodologiya sotsial'no-istoricheskogo poznaniya: podkhod Kembridzhskoi shkoly intellektual'noi istorii // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. №3. 2018 S. 253–260.

5. Pavlov, A. V. Priklyucheniya metoda: Kembridzhskaya shkola (politicheskoi mysli) v kontekstakh // Logos. T. 28. № 4. 2018. C. 261–302.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3