The problem of the integrity of the new Russian system of scientific attestation (by the example of the requirements for a dissertation)

Author:

Egorov Sergey

Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of the integrity of the scientific certification system in modern Russia. After the elimination of the monopoly of the Higher Attestation Commission (HAC), the procedures for awarding academic degrees began to be regulated by a variety of different regulatory and legal acts. The growing variety of rules and regulations raises doubts about whether the system is still capable of ensuring equal rights and opportunities for all applicants for academic degrees. Using the example of the requirements for a dissertation for a degree, the article shows the similarities and differences that exist in different parts of this system. In the course of the study, three subsystems were identified within the system that have relatively similar requirements. The first subsystem is classical and special dissertation councils, directly controlled by the Higher Attestation Commission. The second system is formed by leading scientific and educational organizations that independently award academic degrees. The third subsystem includes spiritual educational organizations that are granted the right to award theological degrees recognized as equivalent to other academic degrees at the level of federal state educational standards. В В В В To consider each of these systems, the relevant requirements of federal legislation, local regulations of educational and scientific organizations that independently award academic degrees, as well as internal regulations of spiritual educational organizations were studied. A comparative analysis of normative and legal acts made it possible to trace how the integrity of the entire system of Russian scientific certification is ensured in the context of the diversity of its forms. In general, this system still remains comparable in terms of requirements for dissertations, but the rights and opportunities of applicants arising after their defense differ markedly depending on the place of defense.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Reference53 articles.

1. Bugaev K.V. Formal'nye kriterii otsenki nauchnykh trudov (na primere izucheniya nazvanii kriminalisticheskikh dissertatsii) // Voprosy kriminologii, kriminalistiki i sudebnoi ekspertizy. 2018. № 2 (44). S. 139-145.

2. Vidrevich M.B., Zaviryukha M.I. Reformirovanie tret'ei stupeni vysshego obrazovaniya na osnovanii zarubezhnogo opyta // Upravlenets. 2017. № 1 (65). S. 66-71.

3. Gabov A.V. Gosudarstvennaya sistema nauchnoi attestatsii kak predmet pravovogo regulirovaniya v postsovetskoe vremya // Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovanii. 2020. T. 2. № 2. S. 48-88.

4. Gabov A.V., Kolotova N.V. Distantsionnoe (udalennoe) uchastie v zashchite dissertatsii // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2021. № 4. S. 35-49.

5. Devyatkin D., Nechaeva E., Suvorov R., Tikhomirov I. Formirovanie nauchnogo landshafta v oblasti sel'skokhozyaistvennykh nauk // Forsait. 2018. T. 12. № 1. S. 57-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.1.57.66.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3